Lumessence, it’s your decision as to what you consider your “average” LD length to be. The system is entirely subjective when it comes to that point. If you think you had what you considered to be a short LD, I’ll believe you. If you believe you had a medium one, I’ll believe you… If you think you had a long one, I’ll believe you… The time is only there so that when I read your DJ entry, I could confirm it… but considering you don’t even have to submit a DJ entry there’s really no way… It’s really an honor based system.
HeadInTheClouds: Your calculations are correct. I removed the “brief” LD length as I considered it cutting hairs. Short, medium, or long. Far simpler in my opinion. I do need to know, though, if you consider your second short LD in which you regained lucidity a “short” LD. You may have had it broken into two parts, but if the sum of those parts is what you would consider a medium LD I’d accept it as so.
Thorn: Once again you prove to me that competition is the right motivation for improving LD length, quality, and quantity. Really wish I was participating right now. I could use a boost. But I digress. Yea, that’s not how I was using the word “grand”, but I left it open to y’all’s interpretation of the word. It was a detail that would usually go unnoticed so I’ll accept it since the goal of this task is to improve the quality of visual details within one’s dreams.
*Scipio winks at everyone.