To quote the chapter ‘Recognising the Divine Finger’ in William Dembsky’s “Intelligent Design”:
"There is an asymmetry between tying a course of action to a sign and tying it to no sign. Consider the following:
“I present to you, God, this offering of cookies and milk. If you want me to eat them for you, please give me no sign. [loud thunder] Since it’s raining outside, I expected the thunder. Thank you for giving me no sign. [powerful earthquake] Since we live on a geological fault, mild tremors aren’t out of the ordinary. Thanks for giving me no sign. [radio comes on unexpectedly and the announcer describes the carcinogenic effects of cookies and milk] This part of the country is known for weird atmospheric disturbances, so thanks for giving me no sign. [loud voice exclaims, “Homer, you big dummy, this is God - don’t eat those cookies and milk!”] Whoa. Back in my teenage years I used to drop acid. I’ve had flashbacks and weird mystical experiences ever since. So, God, thank you for giving me no sign. Amen”
What’s wrong with this prayer? Certainly it seems that Homer is rationalizing away a whole series of signs. By asking for the absence of a sign to confirm eating the cookies and milk, Homer is equivalently asking for a sign to disconfirm eating the cookies and milk. Such signs seem to have been given to him in abundance, and yet Homer rationalizes each of them. Here is the problem: Homer fails to specify a sign. Thus any putative sign that comes along is easily rationalized."
He then goes on to say that, if one does not have direct access to the sign giver, the sign would also have to be very specific and also extra-ordinary.
Now, to something that happened to me. On this very messageboard I was involved in a debate regarding the nature of consciousness and felt I had figured out something very important regarding the non-physical aspect of it and the consequences this would have. During a post I felt the urge to seek a sign from a typing mistake (by putting it into google and clicking on the first thing that came up) and received the line that is now my signature (and philosophy for life!).
Also a similar example to the one Dark Matter and stranger forwarded, regarding the dream-reality interaction: I dreamt I was in a beautiful valley with a river running through it and was told by a voice over I was “in the land of krisna”. The next time I saw my friends who are into hare krisna somewhat, the first story the guy read out was about a person permitted to visit the land of krisna in his dreams. I then told them of my dream and was shown a picture of ‘krisna’s land’ which featured a river running through it!
Rolling two 6’s on a dice is comparatively unspecific and insufficiently extraordinary. Saying “I’m going to roll 6’s now” and rolling 50 pairs of sixes would be in the same league as the above events.
Keep those eyes and ears peeled for signs!