Brother bought a coconut, he bought it for a dime; his sister had another one, she paid it for a lime. She put the lime in the coconut, she drank them both up—she put the lime in the coconut, she drank them both up. She put the lime in the coconut, she drank them both up: she put the lime in the coconut, she called the doctor, woke him up, and said, “Doctor, ain’t there nothin’ I can take, I say, Doctor, to relieve this belly ache? I say, Doctor, ain’t there nothin’ I can take, I say, Doctor, to relieve this belly ache?”
“Now let me get this straight! Put the lime in the coconut, you drank them both up; put the lime in the coconut, you drank them both up? Put the lime in the coconut, you drank them both up; put the lime in the coconut, you called your doctor, woke him up, and say, ‘Doctor, ain’t there nothing I can take, I say, Doctor, to relieve this belly ache? I say, Doctor, doctor, ain’t there nothin’ I can take, I say, Doctor, dooooctor, to relieve this belly ache?’ Put the lime in the coconut, drink them both together, put the lime in the coconut, then you feel better; put the lime in the coconut, drink them both up: put the lime in the coconut, and call me in the morning!”
[spoiler]Oh blast! You had to highlight the spoiler tag, didn’t you? Now, look at that. Look what you’ve done: you spoiled it for yourself. Now you stand there all soaked and miserable because the book is no longer fun. Shame on you…
Seriously, I’ll count to three before I start talking. Last chance to change your mind and de–highlight this spoiler tag. (Boy, I must admit, I’m having fun with the smileys and the random words.) One… Two. Three! :shock:
ahem Where was I again? Well, first, to address to the “why did you bloody read the book to begin with” question Bree asked. no: Well, foremost, to have something to discuss with random people (Harry Potter brings people together , it would seem). Secondly, to kill time :time: — Harry Potter: great thing to read during chemistry classes , or in the metro, or when you’re in town but your friends are not, and you can’t be bothered reading something too serious (like Il Nome Della Rosa, which I read at the same time as I read HP–7) or too technical (like that book on semiotics :shock: I’ve been meaning to read for almost an year now ). Third and more recently, because Potter has become a social phoenomenon and I’d like to understand what happened that made that particular story become so much for so many people.
Because, to me, it’s really a silly time killer story, not something worth of devotion or anything, at least not in my opinion. That doesn’t mean I dislike Harry Potter, or that I would prefer not to have read it, or anything like that. It was quite an enjoyable read. Just not quite a “whoa,” if you know what I mean.
In terms of plot, it was meek at best. Stating you admire Jo for how she plots her story is like stating you admire a guitarist who plays really fast solo in which he never leaves the C harmonic scale (cough Dream Theater cough — lol look at me talking like that about one of my favourite bands! ). It was predictable throughout, one big silly fairy tale, with hero and villain etc. Not for a moment did I have any doubts that Harry would kill Voldemort or that Dumbledore was indeed dead, or that Snape was good (and if he wasn’t, it wouldn’t be surprise enough to change my views on the plot anyways )…
Miserable. The turnpoints and such were just miserable in this book: what, Voldemort dies from a backfiring avada kevadra of his own? SERIOUSLY! And Harry marrying Ginny, it just “happened,” it’s not like something built up, consistently; it wasn’t something I was hooked on and wanted to see what happened. What about those twists, like Draco being the master of the super wand? In my opinion, the plot of Harry Potter was just one big chunk of obvious with a lot of fan–fiction—quality twists. So, seriously, I don’t like the plot at all.
However! On top of that miserable plot, Jo built a lot of very interesting stuff. Her daft sense of British humour and her life experience really show, and are really what hook me to the series. The way she describes the Ministry of Magic after Voldemort takes over it; her depiction of Harry and Hermione’s lives as refugees , Harry’s affair with Cho and the way he’s completely pathetic around girls… That’s real! That’s something worth reading. It’s the silly things, I know, the details, but to me, that’s what made Harry Potter worth reading.
Another thing which completely stunned me, in the good sense, was how Jo dealt with some character’s backgrounds in this book. After the frustrating decision she made not to give Voldemort any depth whatsoever (he was born evil, grew up evil, set up an evil plot, and did evil stuff for the sake of “I am evil, I do evil” ), it was refreshing, to say the least, seeing how she gave us some real background for Dumbledore (ooh so he had an obscure evil past as well!), or Mrs Weasley (I would have never imagined she would use an avada kevadra, but Jo created a context and a situation in which it was a brilliant moment, a “whoa,” so to speak). Now, concerning the deaths, I think they were nicely done. I feel some people were expecting this was all the book would come down to: key deaths. No, no. It was one of Jo’s good deeds in book seven: if it was going to be war, then lots of people, no matter how important to the plot, would die, pretty much at random. Casualties, like in any other war. This is also why I don’t feel she did wrong not to make too big a deal of Remus’ or Tonks’ deaths. It was something that happened on the run, and yes, it was sad, but people couldn’t just stop what they were doing and regret, could they?
I still don’t think Harry Potter will be remembered. It was a bestseller, yes, but that doesn’t prove quality. I’m afraid Harry Potter just didn’t bring anything new, wild or exciting to literature. It was just another story—a big one, that hooked a lot of people, but not something anyone will really mind mentioning in ten years. It’s not like Tom Sawyer (I love that book! ) or The Lord of The Rings (and I absolutely loathe this one ). I don’t think it’s worth defending or anything.
It’s literature. It’s valid. It’s enjoyable. Just didn’t made me feel it should go anywhere near the list of “really great books I have read.” [/spoiler]