all i can discern is that he is saying " you believe in that there is a conspiracy"
in that, when someone like Paul here say s"Yes the US government is openly covering up UFOs even while our nation declassifies them, " then goes on to talk about instance where some Canadian jets were taken down by the force fields around saucers,
then , to me, his words are simply confirmation of that,
now if i were to disbelieve that the US covered such things up, although the Larry King Live discussion on Rosewell SHOWED this cover up , the fake things they did, the lies they told the public, so that is in itself proof…
but if i were to disbelieve in that, then heard this man speak, i would be inclined to agree with him, as most all people would, which would spark interest in investigating if what he said was true, which is what Rhewin advocates,
disbelief in these ideas when looking at all the evidence which is evidence, not “evidence” seems to come from some sort of very negative type of beingness.
i cannot think of any people that would not at least be very open to the idea after encountering all of this information, especially what Paul H recently said, I do not see Paul H as part of a conspiracy, no.
WASD your video is nice but it is also in itself flawed
without the other being knowing for instance, that the fan was the ause of the movement of the lamp, both of them would be equally closed minded, as in, if the other being knew that something else, something “super natural” which there is no such thing, it is true, as everything in existence is and can be measured and observed, then… understand
youtube.com/watch?v=uf04RUFB … re=related
watch this documentary : you will have to come to a conlusion of how thi sman can sit atop a blazing bonfire for so many hours with only his beard being lightly singed, as the wood beneath him turns to ashes,
as his clothes are easily burned with a regular fire ONCE they take the clothes off him
HIS explanation is it is a power given to him by a mantra,
the documentary maker had no explanation at all, as they measured his clothes for chemicals that might block these flames
do you think that this is supernatural ? that depends on what you mean by supernatural, i say it is natural, and it is phenomenal , and it cannot be measured by our instruments, but , the problem is our own senses are instruments.
i won’t say ghosts are real, i haven’t met them, i will say that energies are real, including energies that can move objects by the focus of mind, and i have seen those, regardless,
all your video is doing is making people into clones of that way of analysis, its just analysis, there are many ways to analyze,
i think the point is to be eager to understand multiple ideas and come to know the truth, to examine and critically look at, to investigate fully, to learn,
the thing is that the scientific process is not infallible, because guess what, the people doing the observations are influencing the results no matter what they do , they can’t help it ! that’s quantum physics and has been proven, subatomic particles change based upon how we expect them to behave,
why would a scientist do a study for instance on drugs, if he knew a better thing to use for his desires and goals than drugs, he would be wasting his time, he would not need to spend his lie proving drugs were bad, when he could instead pioneer something else productive and useful for reality rather than cynicism, so for scientists to get together and shoot people and animals full of drugs shows where their thoughts and focuses and ideas are lingering
men of science came up with the idea that slaves who ran away were diseased mentally and they called it draptomania, the psychological sciences are still sciences but they are pathetic at times. so you see,
IT IS SO that the mean of scientific analysis are just as flawed of men as superstition, they are just using different systems, , it is just that men of sceince are a bit more willing to not come to rigid conclusions and allow doubt and interest to keep them learning, whereas men of other systems may not be.
the ultimate paradox is in that your video is presenting ideas, and the ideas become systems, and the ideas become dogmatic, they assert that the way they are showing you to look at how the world operates is the correct way , they themselves become an institution. it becomes very hard to really discern what open mindedness is, except the willingness to find the truth, and what is the truth
hmmm!
there are so many reasons to cultivate and fertilize, exemplifying that the attitudes in that video are not in and of themselves conducive to our well-being
for example newton did NOT discover gravity, every single baby on the face of this earth discovered gravity in their first few years, gravity is obvious, newton just went about describing something as much as he possibly could until a system came up for him to work with, the patterns created allow manipulation of reality and matter and that is magic,
as in, science is magic.
do you know how stupid it is to say netwon discovered gravity, or the law of gravity didn’t people play sports before newton noticed an apple fall from a tree ? that is mass indoctrination if i’ve ever heard it.
didn’t people invent inventions utilizing the obviousness of matter falling ?
newton just took words and ascribed a system around something obvious,
the system allowed us to refine our focus within a language that allowed us to greater exert our will over energy and mass , and matter, science = magic
science is utizliing the will to do something that before was inconveiable , and would be supernatural
cave men didn’t have glass, or light-bulbs,
how the devil did we get light-bulbs ? this world is puzzling beyond measure and yet somehow someone set his will about to manifest this and that then ideas came and he worked with the ideas until they worked then we have a laptop and a computer and movies ,
do you know how foolish it is to say that we cannot fly across the universe and visit planets with ease ?
sure it might take a while, we didn’t go from , supposedly, being cave-men, if that’s what we were, who just barely understood how to have bonfires, to having pcs and spaceships and space shuttles, but the law of science proves that whatever a man shall focus upon, he shall bring into reality and find the means to make his ambitions plausible, then, attainable, then attained, then, his-story.
i present the idea that within the vastness of the known universe it is impossible for there to not be highly developed, technologically advanced beings, however that idea may not be a scientific idea
ex :
wikpedia says Mr Newton was around in the 1500-1600 s ,
now, wikpedia says the catapult was around as early as the something BC’s,
so i concur (with myself ! ) that the people who invented catapults probably already understood the law of gravity , although perhaps not in the same way as newton described it, what do they tell us about laws in science class,
they might just be changed completely or disproven in time, but for now they are an operating system.
i will however say , nweton was surely not the first man who noticed that things fell, then went about measuring their falling, and figuring things out about that.
although this doesn’t have much anything to do with UFOs necessarily.