I do not understand your message Green Dragon,
as for Rhewin I completely understand and totally agree, all those things are irrefutable evidence, and they need be compiled together, and surely have been and are constantly being, that is why disclosure conventions such as that one, of which his speech was only a small part.
now the question would be are you yourself interested in finding and putting together or witnessing these various testimonies, videos, photographs, etc ?
You mention “blurry pictures” however the space station footage is not blurry in and of itself and contains thousands of various sized things, pulsating light in regular rhythmic intervals, which “space junk” would not do , as well as that some of them are calculated at being many many miles in diameter, at least 25.
the only answer for GD is simnply this : the people within systems of authority, to come out in advocacy of having information that is completely objective, sharing it freely with the public, urging the entire world to be transparent about UFO files ( Rhewin myself I have posted the declassified UFO files from Canada and Britain ) , are quite credible.
How can they not be ? Perhaps we could suppose they are trying to plant seeds in our minds about aliens on purpose, and making it up , but that would be a very intensive campaign when a fake invasion would do a lot better of a job as, most of the people of the planet just believe what is On TV and there would be no need to sway the small fringe “votes” on the internet who are actively seeking obscure information.
should one go through the GFL thread you will see that anywhere i post a link i found it interesting and of substantial value to verify that AT LEAST UFOS which are SHIPS and vehicles exist. But understandably if you are only receiving information from my posts and are not interested in delving into the evidence, then you will have a much more skeptical view point and say “hmm”
it is hard to take the hypthesis that there is no ET life wen many many many military , etc, officials are saying contrary openly to the public, not just this one man.
the documentary “the day before disclosure” has been leaked to youtube as i understand it, and i have no seen it, but i am sure it would be an integral piece in shutting the door forever on any discernible doubt.
as in , this is not, some guy, somewhere, saying, yep i saw them, its very very influential people, and i do not see why they would have a sub conspiracy, although some of them i would suspect a degree of disinformation , coming from the obvious and yes, irrefutable understanding the the United States refuses to acknowledge UFOs WHILE at the same time many countries publicly release their UFO files, including footage of mexican air force intercepting a fleet of UFOs which is in my GFL post.
YES , we can take the evidence which is here and run different hypotheses but I do not see that many of the people putting up arguments have looked at it.
This man stated there is still an active cover up
it might be very hard for him to produce black boxes, that could be something you could be jailed or killed for, after-all ,
at the same tim Cananda has relased its UFO files to my recollection, and they are on a Canadian website to see , and ,
unless we go “this man is lying, there is no UFO coverup” then what he says makes sense, and would accurately explain that it would be a bit challenging to show people the hard evidence of every single claim he is making, as even if UFO files in general are declassified it might not mean that all things as obscure as black boxes from planes that were , as it sounds to me, vaporized in the first place, are so easy to get a hold of and show in a public convention.
understand this convention is not being held by people like me : it is being held by people like that man!
. I like the “Mr” though… hmmmm, do I detect a forum name change? Nah.
