You are right. I make a quick judgment. Stupid!! It is not a paradox but a tautological statement.
My supplement is a ‘relative’ theoretical one:
I believe in science to. it is a very interesting practice. It generates in my opinion metaphors to communicate and to understand the world. I could be written in any language; mathematics, in logical constructs, physical laws, fairy tails, symbols etc.
But when you talk about light, you talk about vibration and/or about particles. Both are very different concepts, although they are combined in the concept of light.
Science is then relative, the same as the description off relativity in the relativity theory. And this is also a relative statement or not? But to make it relative you need at least two points. They are related in a specific moment (a). And specific moment (a) is related with a other specific moment (b). You get a matrix of interconnected relativities at a supposed level Y. The relativities in level Y relates to a level Z. From level Z you can understand de basic structure of Y. But you can’t understand how it relates to Z, because you are in Z. You need a meta level X to understand how Y relates to Z and Z to Y.
Its only a concept in specific form to get grip of the world. Maybe it is pure bullshit. But that’s relative. For me this form is a tool to understand on this specific moment aspects of the world.
Relevant in this line of thought is: What is the thing that facilitates this kind of levels. Is that something in the mind of Aristotle; the prime mover:
“Then there is also something which moves it. And since that which is moved while it moves is intermediate, there is something which moves without being moved: something eternal which is both substance and actuality”
Or is this a explanation with a taboo connotation, and is it better to talk about actual science, for example in the form of Computational equivalence formulated by Stephen Wolfram wolfram.com/webresources.html
and this but you need quick time player (see apple) the principle is this
gallery.wolfram.com/images/Animations/3/Rule30
gallery.wolfram.com/images/Anima … rabolDodec
He discovered in his book a New Kind of science the principle of computational equivalence. All kinds of processes are formulated in computational terms. For example simple rules that generates all kinds of patterns, randomness, nested, biological patterns etc etc.
Wolfram thinks that:
“And what this suggests is that a fundamental unity exist across a vast range of processes in nature and elsewhere: despite all their detailed differences every process can be viewed as corresponding to a computation that is ultimately equivalent in its sophistication.”
But all this bla bla leads far from the point made, namely is contact between lucid dreamers possible.
)
Sweet DReamer
but hey it worked