My complaint about LD4All

Even as I sit here, I can’t believe I’m writing this. I’ve never been one to voice my opinions in such a public manner. But after learning that LD4All wants to revive an arcadian past that never existed, I felt I at least had to set a few things straight. First, the misinformation: it suggests that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Where the heck did it come up with that? There is widespread agreement in asking that question, but there is great disagreement in answering it.

LD4All is hooked on designer victimology but fails to notice the real victims: the entire next generation. LD4All seems incapable of understanding that it plans to quash other people’s opinions. It has instructed its collaborators not to discuss this or even admit to its plan’s existence. Obviously, LD4All knows it has something to hide.

As witnesses to mankind’s inner dissatisfaction, we must establish a supportive – rather than an intimidating – atmosphere for offering public comment. Let me rephrase that: If LD4All gets its way, I might very well swallow whatever it dishes out. Does anyone believe LD4All’s claim that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding? Come on, anyone? Like I thought, my cause is to honor our nation’s glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that if we can understand what has caused the current plague of pouty polemics, I believe that we can then perform noble deeds.

LD4All can fool some of the people all of the time. It can fool all of the people some of the time. But it can’t fool all of the people all of the time. We must expose the connections between the dissolute, presumptuous problems that face us and the key issues of immoralism and sensationalism. Only then can a society free of its sinister principles blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that it has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of its successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. But it gets worse than that.

Some critics have called LD4All callow. A handful insist it’s two-faced. Its representatives, on the other hand, consider it to be one of the great minds of this century. LD4All says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I’m concerned, LD4All’s time has run out. Anyway, I hope I’ve made my point, which is that LD4All is a shoo-in for this year’s awarding of “most huffy use of quislingism”.


Just kidding. :smile: Hope I didn’t scare anyone there. I’m just playing around with this nifty little Automatic Complaint Generator that I found a couple of days ago. It actually makes some pretty interesting articles, and the entire thing is put together from randomly selected and altered sentences. You just enter a name, and a few other little options, and away it goes.

Try it out on a company or individual that you know. :grin:

you should have done it on april the first ath! I half believed it at first… but couldn’t understand what you were getting at… :lol:

Lol, after the first few sentences I thought I gotta have missed a lot of the stuff going on in here, since I don’t visit LD4all that often these days. After reading half of your post I was a bit frustrated since I felt that my english was just not good enough to follow your thoughts :wink:

dude, that was…so BELIEVEABLE! I was about to reply with, “I’ll join your cause” when I read the bottom. LOL!

Nice one and I’ll have some fun playing around with that site for a while. I know it was a joke but, what surprised me is that some did not quite pick up on the joke which begs the question. Is there something wrong?

heh… I couldn’t believe what you wrote… i was like “I don’t feel this way at all” but then I read your explaination at the bottom :happy: great one!

I was just confused.

I was like, “Man, this guys is a very eloquent writer! No wonder why he’s a mod!” LOL

Well, I generated a complaint and I’m going to sign my name at the bottom, tuck it into an envelope, and hand it into my boss tomorrow morning. Wish me luck. :smile:

Lol, I had no idea what you were talking about. You were worrying me. Haha, that’s funny…

Before Dream_Reacher starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that even his horoscope says he’s benighted. First, the misinformation: he suggests that it is wild to question his undertakings. Where the heck did he come up with that? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that he and his janissaries take is that complacent underachievers are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically. For the sake of concreteness: He would love to see me fall firmly into the hands of disgusting megalomaniacs. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. If you want to hide something from him, you just have to put it in a book. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I’m running out of space. So here’s one detail to end with: This is a fundamental and obvious truth that Dream_Reacher completely ignores.

:eek: you got me scared there for a while Atheist!

I was like: complaint LD4all? Atheist posted that? :bored:

Then I read the post and was like :confused:

/me slaps Atheist :razz:

I can only hope the readers of this letter are as outraged as I am at Webby Awards. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Webby Awards, not because I harbor any ill-will towards it, but because those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to do what needs to be done have no right to complain when it and its compeers promote violence in all its forms – physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social. Justice isn’t served when Webby Awards’s crimes go unpunished. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me remove the misunderstanding that Webby Awards has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don’t expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because Webby Awards says that it is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. You know, I don’t think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. I think I’ve dished it out to Webby Awards as best as I can in this letter. I hope you now understand why I say that Webby Awards’s secret agents must mend their ways.

hehe, that was actually quite satisfying :content:

My complaint about Athiest’s complaint

I’ll get right to the point. Athiest’s complaint’s central role in the promotion of politically incorrect commercialism dates back a number of years. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change. The moral of the story: What I really want from Athiest’s complaint is an apology.

Automatic complaints. That’s all anyone needs.

I seen the title and thought "complaint thread? hmmm? how can I slip in my complaint, about the forum glitch that insist on me clicking “Click Here to view your message” after replying :tongue: instead of auto-directing. :lol:

… oh, I just did :wink:

I was thinking for a second there, LD4ALL has critics? Isn’t Atheist from my nation? Is this complete crap? Nope just a generated compliant…

Hahaha :rofl: you scared the *** out of me! Magnificent post though :wink:

I was just confused while reading all that… Too many BIG words for me :razz: But it’s actually cool that it’s possible to automatically generate complaints. Should probably save that link for possible future use… :wink:

I’ve seen a number of resentful and biased things over the years, but Mickey Mouse’s schemes really take the cake. I would like to start by discussing Mickey Mouse’s fairy tales, mainly because they scare me. The thing I’m the most frightened about is that if I had to choose the most heinous specimen from Mickey Mouse’s welter of rabid gabble, it would have to be Mickey Mouse’s claim that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one’s psyche is to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity – family, class, private associations. Strange, isn’t it, how the most prudish crackpots I’ve ever seen are always the first to funnel significant amounts of money to hostile carousers? You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it’s too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: If we’re to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to take personal action and remind him about the concept of truth in advertising. Accompanying this recognition of the indeterminateness of verifiability with regard to an external, objective reality has been a crisis regarding our ability to know that Mickey Mouse somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. Also let me say that I overheard one of his followers say, “All major world powers are controlled by a covert group of ‘insiders’.” This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the “us/them” dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity.

Although this has been overlooked or ignored by the established scientific community, Mickey Mouse’s habitués all look like Mickey Mouse, think like Mickey Mouse, act like Mickey Mouse, and create anomie, just like Mickey Mouse does. And all this in the name of – let me see if I can get their propaganda straight – brotherhood and service. Ha! The contemptible particularism I’ve been writing about is not primarily the fault of overweening common criminals, nor of the libidinous, pretentious blusterers who pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. It is the fault of Mickey Mouse. His animadversions are in every respect consistent with the school of putrid thought that tends to use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of benighted, shabby finks. One can examine this from another angle, and plainly see that it’s our responsibility to provide a trenchant analysis of his stratagems. That’s the first step in trying to operate on today’s real – not tomorrow’s ideal – political terrain, and it’s the only way to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. The devil not only finds too much mischief for idle hands to do, but increasingly in our contemporary world, he causes ornery, supercilious Huns to crush any semblance of opposition to Mickey Mouse’s ethically bankrupt disquisitions.

Mickey Mouse hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that Mickey Mouse is not only immoral, but amoral. By the same token, he has been offering the worst sorts of xenophobic, slatternly personæ non gratæ I’ve ever seen a lot of money to create widespread psychological suffering. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that Mickey Mouse needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that he is begging the question when he says that he never engages in frightful, psychotic, or uncompromising politics. Let’s remember that. An inner voice tells me that if there’s an untold story here, it’s that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why Mickey Mouse has lost what little credibility he once had. My peers maintain that we must stick to our guns and not let Mickey Mouse convince us that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. While this is really true, I assert we must add that by allowing him to sacrifice children on the twin altars of frotteurism and greed, we are allowing him to play puppet master.

It would be wrong to imply that Mickey Mouse is involved in some kind of conspiracy to create massive civil unrest. It would be wrong because his criticisms are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but I’m not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to provide unprincipled braggadocios (especially the brain-damaged type) with an irresistible temptation to pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development. Even with the increasing number of doctrinaire wackos, delusional proletariats (like Mickey Mouse) are not born – they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, when one examines the ramifications of letting Mickey Mouse replace our timeless traditions with his petty, contumelious ones, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that no matter how bad you think his witticisms are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. Perhaps Mickey Mouse has some sound arguments on his side, but if so, he’s keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I’ve heard from him are totally irresponsible.

If he opened his eyes, he’d realize that his followers amount to nothing more than truculent, ostentatious insurrectionists riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic. Though malodorous gangsterism is not discussed in this letter, much of what I’ve written applies to that, as well. Mickey Mouse condones the garrulous commentaries that will mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity. His antisocial slogans are to politics what the blitzkrieg was to international diplomacy. This is not rhetoric. This is reality. The bulk of perfidious hatemongers are at least marginally tolerable, but not he. It’s fine to realize that there’s always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed, but it’s more important to know that he claims that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. Well, I beg to differ.

What may seem insignificant or humorous to Mickey Mouse is often hurtful and confusing to others. And that’s why I’m writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to address a number of important issues. There’s no way I can do that alone, and there’s no way I can do it without first stating that he is absolutely determined to believe that it’s inappropriate to teach children right from wrong, and he’s not about to let facts or reason get in his way. There is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Mickey Mouse perverts hatred in order to break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be jaundiced, it becomes clear that if he is going to curry favor with abusive ratbags using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their “value”, their “importance”, their “educational mission”, and other impudent nonsense, then he should at least have the self-respect to remind himself of a few things: First, he thinks nothing of violating the spirit of an indigenous people whose art and songs and way of life are proof that the only appropriate attitudes in a society overrun by pompous astrologers are fear and distrust. And second, if we turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action, then the sea of pauperism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up.

It seems clear that Mickey Mouse unquestionably dropped a clanger by admitting that in every country, there are hypersensitive dirtbags who are every bit as yawping as he. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that I have to wonder where Mickey Mouse got the idea that it is my view that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. This sits hard with me, because it is simply not true, and I’ve never written anything to imply that it is. He has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. Due to the power relationship between the dominator and the dominated, if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you’re wrong. Mickey Mouse’s opinions have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together – life!

Mickey Mouse’s shenanigans are amalgams of popular themes among spiteful used-car salesmen, short-sighted scrubs, and eccentric soi-disant do-gooders. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that’s really the only way you can push a point through to Mickey Mouse. Alas, people often get the impression that brown-nosing ex-cons and Mickey Mouse’s lapdogs are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that Mickey Mouse’s eccentricity is surpassed only by his vanity. And his vanity is surpassed only by his empty theorizing. (Remember his theory that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur?) I will not say what is right and what is wrong when it comes to Mickey Mouse’s analects. But I will say one thing: I can easily see Mickey Mouse performing the following fork-tongued acts. First, he will turn over our country to scurrilous flakes. Then, he will canonize twisted menaces as nomological emblems of propriety. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind.

His ramblings are like an enormous gnosticism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must prevent the production of a new crop of profligate boeotians, because if you don’t think that we have to consider all of our options, then think again. If Mickey Mouse wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn’t just throw out the word “characteristicalness”, for example, and expect us to be scared. In all fairness, his bromides are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, he refers to a variety of things using the word “contradistinctive”. Translating this bit of jargon into English isn’t easy. Basically, he’s saying that hanging out with bookish, bleeding-heart hucksters is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. At any rate, his proposed social programs are worse than the Black Death of olden times. But there’s the rub; we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that his mottos are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that Mickey Mouse is too squalid to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that his assistants believe that profits come before people. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that Mickey Mouse’s activities are on the up-and-up can believe anything, especially if it’s false.

Mickey Mouse’s whiney jeremiads keep a close eye on those who look like they might think an unapproved thought. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to set the record straight. On a more personal note, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like Mickey Mouse conjure up dirt against his fellow human beings. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one’s own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. His bedfellows portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression, but are loath to reveal that Mickey Mouse takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. He also ignores all of the evidence that doesn’t support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. Why don’t more people complain when they see him renege on an incredibly large number of promises? It’s because Mickey Mouse has mastered the art of tricking people with images and myths. He creates myths about what the world is like and then generates false images to match those myths. This proves to me, at least, that I cannot promise not to be angry at Mickey Mouse. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me – as it leads Mickey Mouse – to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge his effete put-downs. So you see, it would be more productive for Mickey Mouse to take a more diplomatic and conciliatory approach.

I can’t read these things - I know the majority of the words, but using all those words one after another really hurt my head.

That, plus the fact that when I read Atheist’s post I didn’t actually know what it was he was complaining about…