my dear basilus,
since you have no answers to my questions and concerns personally (based on your own empirical/experienced knowledge) then my lines of thought are off track?
huh?
i wasn’t asking what anyone ‘believed’ about the subject, but what they ‘thought’…i have no beliefs on the topic…just about a zillion questions, and theories and worries. it is of concern of me that many growing up in the western world-where the ways people are taught to ‘think’ can be roughly grouped as either ‘secular/scientific/rational’ or ‘religious/dogmatic/fundamental’- are adopting ‘beliefs’ and modes of conduct that were only a tiny part of a culture/worldview/mental landscape/framework of cultures now extinct, or suppressed. What could be the empirical/spiritual/psychological effects of such adoptions/hybridizations/combinations…these are the questions that concern me…
my turn to quote. this is from “the crack in the cosmic egg” by john chilton pearce (my favourite book by him is called the “magical child”)
"[…] we live in a web of ideas, a fabric or our own making. “The activity of imagining reality is the center of experience,” […]. The average man, though, picks up his symbols and ideas for imagining from “those that know.” He may never analytically understand the workings of the various disciplines that shape his time, but he senses the general frame of their reference, and becomes very much aware of the drift of their conclusions. He does not contemplate serious matters often. Abstract and logically developed ideas “seep into the untutored thought only as concrete familiar models are found to picture them.” p.146
this is exactly the attitude which i believe will ill-serve any individual truly interested in attaining self-knowledge, and all that good stuff.
i found it curious that you used a “Lost in the woods” metaphor for my ramblings…one of the first passages i happened upon when i picked up “…cosmic egg” was this:
"In this book I have used the metaphors ‘forest’ and ‘clearing’ for our reality and its potential, or for reality adjusted thinking and that continuum of possible synthesis triggered by passionate desire. I have claimed that the correspondences and boundaries between the functions are and always will be obscure. Obscure because conscious looking is a search for verification of the notions that impel the search, and always has a circular, mirroring element in it.
"Imagination nevertheless opens to syntheses larger than the sum total of reason. Something from the dark forest seems to be added to or encompassed by the creative vision from our clearing. The new structures “found” in the forest always reflect the expanding light from the clearing, but are always more than the logical mode of thinking that does the projecting.
“he clearing in the forest, our reality-adjusted thinking, hinges on a comon bond of objective agreement. The threshhold between this kind of thinking and the forest itself i have the autistic mode. Reality-thinking, autistic thinking, and that logically necessary empty category, the unconscious continuum, are all of a piece. You cannot have one without the other. Each implies the other; none are the other; none can ‘be’ except by or in the other. The process of reality is an interaction between the three. They are not discontinuous. They merge slowly and imperceptibly into each other.” (p.150)
i guess this quote speaks for itself, and highlights the importance of just this sort of discourse/discussion/interchange.
although you have accused me of mis-understanding your post (“imagining” it), i feel that it is you that has mis-understood my criticism. perhaps one more quote will clear that up, in relation to my leeriness towards the adoption of indigenous/traditional/pagan rituals/images/psychic functions:
“[…] the adult world of Dream-Time [of australian aborigines] was an abstract, intellectual construct. It was not just raw material from an informational “out there”. Its logical complexity could only be grasped by a mind that had developed to the logical level, which , as Piaget points out, is in early adolescence [tracey, a jungian analyst writes in his book “remaking men” that because our culture has no rites of adulthood, our adolescence can and may extend into middle-age and indeed the maturation pearce speaks of may never occur]. Then the world view developed to that point was disintegrated as a rational structure, while its acquired information was retained. The totem and dream state then acted as screens channeling percepts and determining the autistic hypothesis. The system produced according to its premises, as any cohesive, logical structure should” (p.131).
i guess in pearce’s terms, i’m trying to bring “autistic” thinking in line with “reality adjusted thinking” as a way of experiencing “the clearing”- the light, the truth, the void, the unconscious… even if adjusting to reality means adjusting the way i conceive of reality ad infinitum. which i think was what you were getting at.
oh- and basilus, don’t sell yourself short. you’re as much a philosopher as anyone. more so, cause you actually put yourself in the ring, and risk having to open minds, and open your own…
thankyou so much for giving me the opportunity to clarify so many thoughts/ideas/information within my own mind. what more could a girl ask for?
love
kore kist