Sun-gazing is something I’ve been doing for several months in as many different fashions and manners that I could think of.
newtreatments.org/sungazingsites
rawpaleodiet.org/sungazing/ *2
mintaka.sdsu.edu/GF/vision/Galileo.html
iblindness.org/books/bates/ch17.html *1
I started this thread advertising certain claims of health and well-being as well as spiritual consciousness that comes from a practice of gazing at the sun.
It is greatly refreshing and makes the body feel full of light, and has the potential to cause the experience of radiant bright inner white light flooding the consciousness, as described as moments of enlightenment by various spiritual traditions.
Some people steadfastly believe there are dangers, and here in article *1 is an excerpt from an eye-doctor who tested these claims thoroughly and found them to be false. He does not recommend the practice to those of imperfection vision, for he notes that they have a hard time looking at any lights at all, but that any damage done is the result of illusions generated by imperfect eyes, which heals in time. One remarkable instance was bringing a woman with 20/70 vision to 20/10 simply by having her sun-gaze.
There is a very strong inclination for people to claim it is absolute fact that sunlight is dangerous for eyes, and UV radiation too, and herein we are debating in this thread. My research says NO, absolutely not! Article *2 does a wonderful job at refuting all of these claims while basically saying “no one should sun-gaze” as a standard disclaimer. The most interesting illustration is a story of Americans put in a Korean POW camp who were forced to stare at the sun for 10 hours a day, those of them who used to wear glasses, after under-going these extreme conditions, no longer needed them at all!
One may then say “this is anecdotal”, indeed. Dr. Bates in Article *1 states that there are individuals who, looking at the sun for even half a second, have after-images that last them for months, and then, beleive this to be permanent damage, however, expounds upon why the after-images develop, and asserts that with practice of his central fixation exercises (completely outlined in this free book) ALL instances of said malfunction dissipate.
Basically meaning : it is temporary.
Basically meaning: if one were to greatly feel inclined to learn a form of photosynthesis, which I can attest to as being real, if they were to look at the sun within 5 minutes of rise or set, for no more than 10 seconds on their first day, they could see for themselves what they think of the practice, and how their eyes are after doing it.
Now, to talk about my after-image experiences, I followed Hira Ratan Manek’s system of sun-gazing within 1 hour of rise or set for roughly 3 months, approaching 10 minutes of steady sun-gazing.
His method is very superior as he outlines a process of looking at this sun in increments of +10 seconds per day, until one reaches 44 minutes in 9 months.
As in, day 1 = 10 seconds, day 2 = 20. And only doing it within 1 hour of sunrise or set.
I would change that to “within 5 minutes of sunrise or set” until you’ve done it for more than 5 minutes, for within 1 hour is QUITE BRIGHT for me, and it is only after working on disciplining myself to be able to gaze at ANY time of day that I can say “one hour is not that bright anymore”
after - image stories: a few times I have scarcely been able to see after an arrogant session of extensive sun-gazing outside of the 1 hour window. This has always dissipated. Before I fully researched I was a bit dismayed, but now I can look at the sun any time of day, even at high noon, for many many minutes, and get an after-image that is annoying at best, and in no way all encompassing.
Basically, this is the fault of imperfected vision being highly exacerbated,
the eyes hold a tremendous amount of strain, all the time, when they are not functioning properly, and exposing them to sunshine greatly confronts this strain, it is with this knowledge that many practitioners of Bate’s method
www.iblindness.org
advocate another way which is called a “burning glass” which I have not tried. Looking at the blogs of sun-gazers who HAVE had an after-image to the point of thinking they had permanently damaged their eyes has only reinforced the knowledge that no matter what happens, as Bates says in article *1, it is only TEMPORARY.
This is a bunch of boring disclaimer-esque information,
why sun-gaze? It’s wonderful! Why AVOID ? If you think its silly, or reading this knowledge makes you believe it to be dangerous.
Within 5 minutes of rise or set, all research greatly exclaims IT IS NOT.